This book is for anyone who actually believes that Dan Brown's "Da Vinci Code" is based on "facts".
It uses a Q & A format to present Brown's errors and then uses legitimate scholarly sources to refute them.
The book is a very easy read and provides you with legitimate sources that you can easily verify, which is something that is severely lacking in Brown's book. His characters are always referring to "experts" that are unnamed.
This is one of the best books, exposing the false "facts" of the "Da Vinci Code", that I've read thus far.
It uses a Q & A format to present Brown's errors and then uses legitimate scholarly sources to refute them.
The book is a very easy read and provides you with legitimate sources that you can easily verify, which is something that is severely lacking in Brown's book. His characters are always referring to "experts" that are unnamed.
This is one of the best books, exposing the false "facts" of the "Da Vinci Code", that I've read thus far.
Helpful Score: 1
This book is interesting to a degree - but fails to truly counter act the Da Vinci Code. It does not cite sources or adequately argue the larger points.
