Sequel to Bram Stoker's famous DRACULA. Written by Dacre Stoker, his great-grandnephew and Ian Holt. Starts slowly. Lots of information. I found myself skipping pages to find something to hold my interest. I suppose I anticipated more from it than it was able to deliver. 2.5 stars

Share/Like this Review?

Interesting sequel by a relative of the author of the classic "Dracula", Bram Stoker. Violates some of Bram's "rules" for vampires, but explains discrepancies well.
However, it took me forever to read! I would whip through several chapters, then it just seemed to drag on and on, then whip through a few more, then drag again.

Includes supplementary material about how/why sequel was written, some history surrounding the original classic, etc.

Share/Like this Review?

Story was a bit slow to take off but then it really started hitting its stride. I could easily envision this on the big screen with the cast of the 1992 version from Francis Ford Coppola.

As i neared the end, I realized I would like the story to go on and the authors did not fail to deliver the possibility of another installment.

Share/Like this Review?

Poorly done, got halfway through and stopped. Lots of explicitly described sex and violence, the writing was mediocre, and nothing in the book-characters, etc- really held my attention. I only got halfway through because I kept hoping that it would improve. Then I realized how far I'd read and that it was not going to get any better.

Share/Like this Review?

This was a good read and actually followed the first story line well. I still love the original Dracula - no one can beat Bram Stoker, not even his great-grandnephew.

Share/Like this Review?

Pathetic excuse for a Dracula sequel. Gave it the extra 1/2 star because there were, at times, some cringe-worthy yet hilarious dialogue and plot twists.

Share/Like this Review?