Helpful Score: 3
I read this book because it was a feature recommendation by the library staff and I like historical novels with a bit of mystery and romance. However, this book did not live up to my expectations although I read the entire thing. Janet Evanovich meets Phillipa Gregory! The plot was intriguing but after about 100 pages I realized I didn't really care for the characters or the "mystery". Another reviewer used the word "cheesy" regarding the action scenes, and it also describes the whole book quite well in my opinion. Tedious, with a lot of "Excuse me?!" type of expressions. "Silly" would about cover this so-called "saga".
Helpful Score: 3
Reviewed by Candace Cunard for TeensReadToo.com
After the death of her great-aunt, Julie's world is turned upside down. Aunt Rose had raised Julie and her twin sister, Janice, since they were three years old and survived a car crash that killed both of their parents. Now, more than twenty years later, Julie still doesn't know much about her family, except that her mother was American and her father Italian, and that they both died near the city of Siena. So when Aunt Rose leaves the entire monetary value of her estate to Janice, and gives Julie nothing but the key to a Sienese safe-deposit box, Julie is horrified at such an unequal distribution of her aunt's fortune, but also intrigued by this chance to find out more about her own heritage. With nothing left to lose, she hops a plane to Siena and sets to work uncovering the mystery that her mother had been at work on when she died.
Julie quickly discovers that her real name is not Julie Jacobs, but Giulietta Tolomei, and that, if her mother's theories were correct, she is descended in the female line from the Giulietta Tolomei who was the inspiration for the character of Juliet in Shakespeare's ROMEO & JULIET - a story, she discovers, that was originally set, not in Verona, but in Siena. The clues left behind by her mother lead Julie to uncover the remains of the family feud between the Tolomeis and Salimbenis in modern-day Siena, and to delve deeper into the origins of the Shakespearean play that Julie already knows by heart.
The novel switches between presenting modern-day events from Julie's first-person point of view and narrating the events surrounding the original medieval tale of Romeo and Giulietta. As Julie reads the documents left for her by her mother, she discovers alarming facts - for example, that Romeo and Giulietta were not from feuding families, but that a third man stepped in and caused all of the trouble - and begins to ask questions that might put her in danger if heard by the wrong people.
Without a doubt, my favorite parts of the book were when Fortier described modern-day Siena. I've traveled in Italy before (though not to Siena), and her depiction of a city so steeped in history and so connected to its own past both rang true from my experiences of other cities and made me want to visit Siena. I enjoyed Julie's first-person segments of the narrative more than the flashback tale of the original Romeo and Giulietta, where Fortier's attempt to use more time-appropriate language resulted in a strange mishmash of medieval and modern phrasing. I felt much more strongly for the characters in the present of the story than for Fortier's recast Romeo and Giulietta (though I must admit that I never really liked Shakespeare's version, either).
The plot twists and turns itself into an impressive labyrinthine structure, but if you're not paying attention, it's possible to get lost. For this reason, I'd recommend this book primarily to readers who've already encountered ROMEO & JULIET, and particularly to those who enjoyed the story but aren't afraid to see it rewritten in some thought-provoking ways.
After the death of her great-aunt, Julie's world is turned upside down. Aunt Rose had raised Julie and her twin sister, Janice, since they were three years old and survived a car crash that killed both of their parents. Now, more than twenty years later, Julie still doesn't know much about her family, except that her mother was American and her father Italian, and that they both died near the city of Siena. So when Aunt Rose leaves the entire monetary value of her estate to Janice, and gives Julie nothing but the key to a Sienese safe-deposit box, Julie is horrified at such an unequal distribution of her aunt's fortune, but also intrigued by this chance to find out more about her own heritage. With nothing left to lose, she hops a plane to Siena and sets to work uncovering the mystery that her mother had been at work on when she died.
Julie quickly discovers that her real name is not Julie Jacobs, but Giulietta Tolomei, and that, if her mother's theories were correct, she is descended in the female line from the Giulietta Tolomei who was the inspiration for the character of Juliet in Shakespeare's ROMEO & JULIET - a story, she discovers, that was originally set, not in Verona, but in Siena. The clues left behind by her mother lead Julie to uncover the remains of the family feud between the Tolomeis and Salimbenis in modern-day Siena, and to delve deeper into the origins of the Shakespearean play that Julie already knows by heart.
The novel switches between presenting modern-day events from Julie's first-person point of view and narrating the events surrounding the original medieval tale of Romeo and Giulietta. As Julie reads the documents left for her by her mother, she discovers alarming facts - for example, that Romeo and Giulietta were not from feuding families, but that a third man stepped in and caused all of the trouble - and begins to ask questions that might put her in danger if heard by the wrong people.
Without a doubt, my favorite parts of the book were when Fortier described modern-day Siena. I've traveled in Italy before (though not to Siena), and her depiction of a city so steeped in history and so connected to its own past both rang true from my experiences of other cities and made me want to visit Siena. I enjoyed Julie's first-person segments of the narrative more than the flashback tale of the original Romeo and Giulietta, where Fortier's attempt to use more time-appropriate language resulted in a strange mishmash of medieval and modern phrasing. I felt much more strongly for the characters in the present of the story than for Fortier's recast Romeo and Giulietta (though I must admit that I never really liked Shakespeare's version, either).
The plot twists and turns itself into an impressive labyrinthine structure, but if you're not paying attention, it's possible to get lost. For this reason, I'd recommend this book primarily to readers who've already encountered ROMEO & JULIET, and particularly to those who enjoyed the story but aren't afraid to see it rewritten in some thought-provoking ways.
Helpful Score: 2
As a Shakespearean English minor in college Romeo & Juliet is one of my favorite works of William Shakespeare but any student of Shakespeare knows that while he may have been brilliant he was also somewhat of a literary thief, taking pieces from other works and making it his own. This theme weaves itself into the book Juliet by Anne Fortier. Jumping between present day and that of the 1340's in Siena we follow the story of Romeo & Guilietta and of the modern day counterpart. What Anne Fortier has done in this story is fantastic. I haven't found a book yet that I haven't liked which encompasses this method and her work is no different.
Helpful Score: 2
I normally flunk books that choose to reverb my favorite classics, but i L-O-V-E-D this. Told through Juliet's perspective in the present, she finds herself retracing her family roots in Italy through clues left from her mother. (I know it sounds soooo boring). The first several pages almost completely discouraged me. Then the flash backs to Romeo and Juliet began and I winced with pain before I read the words. After sticking with it, I was biting my nails and racing through several chapters in angst to find out what new curve ball Fortier was throwing. Anyone who is familiar with Romeo and Juliet will appreciate this modernized re-telling. I FELL IN LOVE with all the characters past and present. By the end I was wishing for more. My only gripe with this is I wish there was a bit more passion between the modern day Alessandro and Juliet. Juliet's twin sister was a character I would have been happy without, but then the story would have felt incomplete for some of the pieces adding up to the end puzzle. Some things felt a bit forced and hard to reckon with, but I would still read this over and over. I want it to be a movie!
A great read! 'Juliet' will keep the reader turning page after page on the treasure hunt; entranced by historical fact, fiction and romance. Fortier's writing is a gem. Don't miss reading this book!
I read this book because of the overwhelmingly positive reviews on Goodreads. Unfortunately, I just didn't get into it. It's the sort of book I usually like - a historical mystery, with the past and present intertwining. But I felt that so many opportunities for exploring the intersection of history, literature and modern life were missed, in this book.
I also had to keep stopping in the middle of the story to say, about the characters' actions: "but no! A person just wouldn't DO that!" (In her acknowledgements, the author admits that she is aware that, for example, the Director of a hotel in Italy would not "interfere with the movements of their guests or remove personal belongings from their rooms." So - don't have your character do those things! It's unbelievable, when the plot gives no excuse why someone would behave in such an uncharacteristic way!) I just found it unconvincing, and it happened over and over again.
And then, when the main character sneaks into a university library and STEALS items from their archive, I lost all sympathy for her. Especially since the book doesn't really even criticize her actions.
After that, I just found it to be overly long and slow-moving, with metaphysical parts that were just eh, and action scenes that reminded me of something out of a cheesy movie like "National Treasure."
I also had to keep stopping in the middle of the story to say, about the characters' actions: "but no! A person just wouldn't DO that!" (In her acknowledgements, the author admits that she is aware that, for example, the Director of a hotel in Italy would not "interfere with the movements of their guests or remove personal belongings from their rooms." So - don't have your character do those things! It's unbelievable, when the plot gives no excuse why someone would behave in such an uncharacteristic way!) I just found it unconvincing, and it happened over and over again.
And then, when the main character sneaks into a university library and STEALS items from their archive, I lost all sympathy for her. Especially since the book doesn't really even criticize her actions.
After that, I just found it to be overly long and slow-moving, with metaphysical parts that were just eh, and action scenes that reminded me of something out of a cheesy movie like "National Treasure."
one of the best books I've read in a while!
Great read, especially being a fan of Shakespeare's play.
I really enjoyed this!
