Sins of the Fathers (Chief Inspector Wexford, Bk 2)
Author:
Genre: Mystery, Thriller & Suspense
Book Type: Paperback
Author:
Genre: Mystery, Thriller & Suspense
Book Type: Paperback
Second in the Inspector Wexford series, this book reveals Wexford, at times, from the point of view of others. He seems disheveled, cranky, obstinate. It takes a bit for us to glimpse the more thoughtful, introspective detective. I wonder if Rendell was still sharpening her perception of this character.
The Reverend Henry Archery visits Wexford, an old friend, to ask about a case from sixteen years back. Herbert Arthur Painter was convicted of a vicious murder and hanged. Wexford was a young detective then, and in charge of the case. He remembers it and he is just as sure these many years later that they got the right man.
Archery hopes to shake that certainty. Why? Because his son wants to marry Painter's daughter.
This novel takes place in the late 1960s, it appears, and many people believed then (and some do now) that certain traits were genetic. That, in this case, Painter's daughter might take after her old man. Might have criminal tendencies. This seemed silly to me, but it was taken seriously here.
The Rev was set on opposing the marriage if he found out for sure that the dear girl's father had in fact committed that murder years ago.
I was stuck thinking about the hanged man. If it should turn out that Wexford was wrong then, where does that leave him? In the real world, of course, this sort of thing happens. Would it happen here as well, and would Wexford forever after be haunted by it?
There is no official re-investigation, of course. But Wexford and underling Burden slice out bits of their days to look into the case again. Wexford remains convinced that he did not get it wrong but he is open to finding out more.
And more he does find out. More, perhaps, than most of us would guess. The secret investigation takes us into many different lives and parts of England, but it is worth it in the end.
A quick one to read, intriguing and as always full of interesting and absorbing characters.
The Reverend Henry Archery visits Wexford, an old friend, to ask about a case from sixteen years back. Herbert Arthur Painter was convicted of a vicious murder and hanged. Wexford was a young detective then, and in charge of the case. He remembers it and he is just as sure these many years later that they got the right man.
Archery hopes to shake that certainty. Why? Because his son wants to marry Painter's daughter.
This novel takes place in the late 1960s, it appears, and many people believed then (and some do now) that certain traits were genetic. That, in this case, Painter's daughter might take after her old man. Might have criminal tendencies. This seemed silly to me, but it was taken seriously here.
The Rev was set on opposing the marriage if he found out for sure that the dear girl's father had in fact committed that murder years ago.
I was stuck thinking about the hanged man. If it should turn out that Wexford was wrong then, where does that leave him? In the real world, of course, this sort of thing happens. Would it happen here as well, and would Wexford forever after be haunted by it?
There is no official re-investigation, of course. But Wexford and underling Burden slice out bits of their days to look into the case again. Wexford remains convinced that he did not get it wrong but he is open to finding out more.
And more he does find out. More, perhaps, than most of us would guess. The secret investigation takes us into many different lives and parts of England, but it is worth it in the end.
A quick one to read, intriguing and as always full of interesting and absorbing characters.
Back to all reviews by this member
Back to all reviews of this book
Back to Book Reviews
Back to Book Details
Back to all reviews of this book
Back to Book Reviews
Back to Book Details
